Comments for jude pereira's blog http://judepereira.com/blog a terminal, an interface... and me! Fri, 18 May 2012 02:57:00 +0000 hourly 1 Comment on The Unofficial Gentoo Linux x86 uClibC stage3s’ by judepereira http://judepereira.com/blog/x86-uclibc-stages/comment-page-1/#comment-4036 judepereira Fri, 18 May 2012 02:57:00 +0000 http://judepereira.com/blog/?p=499#comment-4036 Hi, Yes I will upload the new stages shortly, I currently do not have a good internet connection to build the stages. Hi,
Yes I will upload the new stages shortly, I currently do not have a good internet connection to build the stages.

]]> Comment on The Unofficial Gentoo Linux x86 uClibC stage3s’ by Carlos http://judepereira.com/blog/x86-uclibc-stages/comment-page-1/#comment-4035 Carlos Fri, 18 May 2012 02:15:00 +0000 http://judepereira.com/blog/?p=499#comment-4035 My friend, you post new files ? ex.: uclibc-x86-2012 ? Thanks... (Sorry My English Is Not Cool).... My friend, you post new files ? ex.: uclibc-x86-2012 ?
Thanks…
(Sorry My English Is Not Cool)….

]]> Comment on embedded gentoo [uclibc] | nothing beats this by guess http://judepereira.com/blog/going-embedded-with-mgentoo/comment-page-1/#comment-4034 guess Tue, 01 May 2012 13:11:00 +0000 http://judepereira.com/blog/?p=535#comment-4034 portage lists pax-utils in RDEPEND while sandbox has it in DEPEND. Both have no useflags involved, so pax-utils seem to be mandatory. The sandbox ebuilds point to a bug report in regards to pax-utils: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265376 portage lists pax-utils in RDEPEND while sandbox has it in DEPEND. Both have no useflags involved, so pax-utils seem to be mandatory.

The sandbox ebuilds point to a bug report in regards to pax-utils: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=265376

]]> Comment on embedded gentoo [uclibc] | nothing beats this by judepereira http://judepereira.com/blog/going-embedded-with-mgentoo/comment-page-1/#comment-4032 judepereira Tue, 01 May 2012 13:03:00 +0000 http://judepereira.com/blog/?p=535#comment-4032 Oh, pax-utils wasn't involved when I build my embedded filesystem. Maybe some use flags are pulling it in? Yes, we could certainly have a chat on the IRC, I've just got back from my vacations, so I'll take another day to get my internet connection working. Oh, pax-utils wasn’t involved when I build my embedded filesystem. Maybe some use flags are pulling it in?

Yes, we could certainly have a chat on the IRC, I’ve just got back from my vacations, so I’ll take another day to get my internet connection working.

]]> Comment on embedded gentoo [uclibc] | nothing beats this by guess http://judepereira.com/blog/going-embedded-with-mgentoo/comment-page-1/#comment-4031 guess Tue, 01 May 2012 12:48:00 +0000 http://judepereira.com/blog/?p=535#comment-4031 The pointer to pax-utils was rather meant for Acroyear249. :) I had no problems to build it. As far as I can tell pax-utils is required by these packages/versions: dev # equery d pax-utils * These packages depend on pax-utils: sys-apps/portage-2.1.10.49 (>=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17) sys-apps/sandbox-2.5 (>=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19) dev # grep -i pax-utils /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-* /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.10.49.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17 /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.10.57.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17 /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.6.13.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17 /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.6.7.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17 /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.2.0_alpha101.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17 /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.2.0_alpha89.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17 /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-9999.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17 dev # grep -i pax-utils /usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-* /usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-1.6-r2.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19" #265376 /usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-2.3-r1.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19" #265376 /usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-2.4.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19" #265376 /usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-2.5.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19" #265376 Btw. are you around on an IRC channel? Maybe we could have a chat there. :) The pointer to pax-utils was rather meant for Acroyear249. :) I had no problems to build it.

As far as I can tell pax-utils is required by these packages/versions:

dev # equery d pax-utils
* These packages depend on pax-utils:
sys-apps/portage-2.1.10.49 (>=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17)
sys-apps/sandbox-2.5 (>=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19)

dev # grep -i pax-utils /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-*
/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.10.49.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17
/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.10.57.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17
/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.6.13.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17
/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1.6.7.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17
/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.2.0_alpha101.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17
/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.2.0_alpha89.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17
/usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/portage-9999.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.17

dev # grep -i pax-utils /usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-*
/usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-1.6-r2.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19″ #265376
/usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-2.3-r1.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19″ #265376
/usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-2.4.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19″ #265376
/usr/portage/sys-apps/sandbox/sandbox-2.5.ebuild: >=app-misc/pax-utils-0.1.19″ #265376

Btw. are you around on an IRC channel? Maybe we could have a chat there. :)

]]>